‘Culture fit’ is how good centres talk themselves out of great leaders
The most cited reason a senior candidate gets passed over is the one nobody can define. A contrarian read on the orthodoxy most GCC panels never question.
Talent Radar · Cybersecurity: 73% of Indian firms still can't find the security talent they need.
Get the reportThe strong opinions behind the data — leadership takes on GCC talent from Sachith Rai and the Recruise team, argued from the placement record and defended. Contrarian reads on the orthodoxies most GCC panels never question.
The three perspectives we’d start with — the arguments the rest of the collection builds on. Want the thinking applied to your centre? Work with Recruise →
The candidates who apply are self-selecting for availability, not calibre. Sachith Rai on why the market’s obsession with the active funnel quietly costs you the best seats.
Read → PerspectiveA prediction. The GCCs writing today’s savings decks are hiring the wrong leaders for the mandate they’ll actually be handed. Sachith Rai on the shift already underway.
Read → PerspectiveA published band tells you where the market was six months ago. Sachith Rai on why the big firms stop exactly where the useful part begins.
Read →The most cited reason a senior candidate gets passed over is the one nobody can define. A contrarian read on the orthodoxy most GCC panels never question.
It’s almost never the money. From hundreds of senior closes, the one thing the winning offer got right that the runner-up didn’t.
Speed is easy to measure, so it’s the thing everyone optimises. Rajesh Pandian on what a rushed senior hire actually costs you two years out, when the bill finally lands.
Against our own commercial interest: the executive seats a company should never outsource to any search firm.
The market blames the counter-offer. We think that’s the wrong culprit. A contrarian view on where senior mandates really lose the candidate.
Most senior reqs describe a role that’s already changing shape. Sachith Rai on what the market gets wrong about future-proofing a leadership bench.
Three inherited HQ assumptions that fail in-market, and why cloning the parent company’s playbook is the fatal one.
By the time a leader is leaving, the mistake is eighteen months old. A hard truth about why the best retention work happens before the offer.
‘Head of’ means less every year, and it’s distorting how leaders are hired and paid. What we see when the label and the mandate stop matching.
Nothing matches those filters yet.
Try removing one, or browse another topic from the filter bar.
Five minutes, every ten days. Our read on the senior GCC talent market — the short form of the perspectives and opinions we publish here. One signal, the read behind it, one thing worth doing.
Topic
What separates centres that own outcomes from ones that only execute — and the leaders who make the difference.
14 articles→
Topic
Where this market is going, and which parts of the current playbook won’t survive the next three years.
14 articles→
Topic
What’s actually changing in how GCC work gets done, read from live mandate data rather than a trend deck.
12 articles→Cookies, and how you control them.
We use strictly-necessary cookies to run the site, and — only if you allow it — analytics to understand in aggregate how it's used. No advertising, no selling data. You can change this any time from Cookie settings in the footer. Read our Cookie Policy.
We detected a Global Privacy Control signal from your browser and are honouring it as an opt-out — analytics stays off.