The full-time hires that stay.
Most of a GCC's hiring isn't a headline search or a flat-out ramp. It's the steady, permanent build, the engineers, analysts, managers, and specialists who become the centre. We run that hiring as a calibrated process, so the people who sign are the people still in seat a year later.
A permanent hire that leaves in ten months cost you twice.
Permanent hiring is the part everyone assumes is solved. There's a JD, a panel, a pipeline of CVs. So it gets handed to whoever has bandwidth, and the bar lives in one busy manager's head. It looks like it's working right up until the regretted hires start showing up.
The cost of a wrong permanent hire isn't the fee. It's the ramp time you spent, the work that stalled, the backfill search you now run twice, and the team that watched a misfit get hired and quietly recalibrated what "good enough" means here.
Doing it well is a process problem, not an effort one. A scorecard the panel actually shares, a market read on what the role really pays and where the people are, and a structured assessment that predicts whether someone will still be here, and still be good, a year from now. Most firms send CVs. We run the process that makes the hire last.
Hired to a standard. Built to stay.
Every permanent mandate runs the same disciplined arc: agree what "right" means, find the people the open market won't surface, and assess for the things that actually predict tenure.
How a permanent search moves.
Four phases. Senior searches across the firm typically run brief-to-offer in around seven weeks, faster when the market is deep, slower when we're protecting the bar. We size it to the role, not a template.
The numbers that move.
Firm-wide figures, drawn from twenty years of permanent placements. Not promises, what tends to happen when a hire is run as a calibrated process instead of a CV race.
A core team built to last, one calibrated hire at a time.
"We've placed senior leaders through Recruise across three years. All of them are still here. That's the number that mattered to the board when we extended the relationship."
If this is part of a bigger problem.
Permanent hiring rarely travels alone. It sits above the leadership layer, beside the flex capacity, and on top of the market read that tells you what each role really costs.
Intelligence on hiring that lasts.
The reports, newsletters, and conversations behind how we hire for retention rather than just the offer. All free to read.
Questions we get asked.
If you don't see what you're looking for, the form below is the fastest route. Most enquiries get a response within one working day.
How is this different from Executive Search?
How is this different from Scale-Up Hiring?
What functions and levels do you cover?
How do you actually improve retention?
How is permanent staffing priced?
Can you handle several roles at once?
Tell us about the roles you're hiring for.
Give us the functions, the levels, and the volume. We'll come back with a read on how the market supplies them and how we'd run the searches, even if we don't end up running them.