The profile they said didn't exist in India usually does.
Pharma and biotech GCCs are moving up the value chain, from operations into clinical, regulatory, translational science, and real-world data. The leaders who can run that work are rare, often the only handful in the country, and almost never on the open market. Finding them is an intelligence problem before it's a search.
The role is real. The market that can fill it is tiny and quiet.
A Head of Translational Medicine or a regulatory leader for a new therapeutic area may have a dozen genuine candidates in the country. Most are deep in important work, bound by IP and notice, and have no reason to read a job post. A generic search returns the same recycled names and none of the people who could actually do it.
Comp is its own puzzle. There is no clean benchmark for a profile that only a handful of people hold, so bands get set by analogy and come out wrong. Get it low and the one person you wanted never engages. Get the discretion wrong and you signal your strategy to the market.
How we fill roles the market says are unfillable.
Specialist life-sciences hiring rewards depth and discretion. We map the real universe, approach it carefully, and price it from evidence, not analogy.
The numbers that move.
Aggregates across pharma and biotech mandates we ran in 2024 to 2025. Not promises, what tends to happen on specialist searches.
Questions we get asked.
If you don't see what you're looking for, the form below is the fastest route. Most enquiries get a response within one working day.
Which pharma and biotech roles do you cover?
The profile we need barely exists in India. Is it worth searching?
How do you protect confidentiality?
How do you benchmark comp for a role with no clean market?
Tell us the specialist role you need to fill.
Give us the profile and the city. We'll come back with an honest read on the universe and the comp, even if we don't end up running the search.