From your first hire to your first hundred.
A Global Capability Centre lives or dies on its first leaders. Get them right and the centre compounds. Get them wrong and you spend two years correcting. We build the centre leadership first, the country head, then the function heads, then the hundred beneath them, on the intelligence behind 4,000 senior placements into India's GCCs. New build or stalled centre, the order matters.
Most GCC problems were set in the first ten hires.
A new centre feels like a headcount exercise, so it gets run like one: a target, a recruiter, a race to fill seats. Then the country head arrives to a team they didn't pick, a culture set by whoever got hired first, and a mandate that's already drifted from what HQ intended.
The stalled centre is the same story a year on. Attrition is high, the senior layer is thin, HQ has lost confidence, and nobody can quite say where it went wrong. It went wrong at the top, early, when the leadership came after the headcount instead of before it.
A GCC build is a leadership problem first. Get the country head and the function heads right, give them the intelligence to hire well beneath them, and the hundred that follows is sound. We run it in that order, for a new centre or a turnaround.
Leadership first. Then the team. Then scale.
We build a centre in the order that makes it hold: the leaders who set the bar, the team they shape, and the growth engine that keeps both intact as you scale.
How a centre goes from plan to first hundred.
Four phases. Most new centres place founding leadership inside the first quarter and reach the first hundred inside a year. A transformation runs the same arc, starting from where the centre stalled.
The numbers that move.
Aggregates across GCC set-up and transformation mandates, 2024–2025. Not promises, what tends to happen when the leadership goes in before the headcount.
When a stalled centre got its second start.
"Our Pune centre had stalled at 60 people with attrition we couldn't explain and a thin senior bench. Recruise reset the leadership first, then rebuilt under it. A year on we're past 200 and HQ trusts the centre again."
If this is part of a bigger build.
A GCC build pulls on the whole practice. The leadership searches, the team hiring, and the comp framework usually run as one of these alongside it.
Intelligence on building a GCC.
The reports, newsletters, and conversations behind how we set up and reset centres. All free to read.
Questions we get asked.
If you don't see what you're looking for, the form below is the fastest route. Most enquiries get a response within one working day.
Do you set up the legal entity, or just the team?
What does "leadership first" mean in practice?
Can you fix a centre that's already stalled?
How long until the centre is self-sufficient?
How is this different from a dedicated dev centre?
Which functions can the centre cover?
Tell us about the centre you want to build or fix.
Give us the mandate, the stage, and the timeline. We'll come back with a read on the leadership the centre needs first, even if we don't end up running the build.